Chase Cambria
  • Log in
  • Not a member yet?
go
  • Contact
  • Webmail
  • Archive
 
  • Home
  • Overview
  • Journal Issues
  • Special Issues
  • Subscriptions
  • Editorial Board
  • Author Guidelines

International Corporate Rescue

Journal Issues

  • Vol 1 (2004)
  • Vol 2 (2005)
  • Vol 3 (2006)
  • Vol 4 (2007)
  • Vol 5 (2008)
  • Vol 6 (2009)
  • Vol 7 (2010)
  • Vol 8 (2011)
  • Vol 9 (2012)
  • Vol 10 (2013)
  • Vol 11 (2014)
  • Vol 12 (2015)
  • Vol 13 (2016)
  • Vol 14 (2017)
  • Vol 15 (2018)
  •         Issue 1
  •         Issue 2
  •         Issue 3
  •         Issue 4
  •         Issue 5
  •         Issue 6
  • Vol 16 (2019)
  • Vol 17 (2020)
  • Vol 18 (2021)
  • Vol 19 (2022)

Vol 15 (2018) - Issue 2

Article preview

'Compensatory Advantages' and Avoidance Powers in the Insolvency of a Company that Gives an Intra-Group Guarantee: Spanish Experience

Professor Angel Carrasco, Faculty of Law, University Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain

I. Introduction and previous legal doctrine

As in other jurisdictions, Spanish law has long faced the problem of the validity and enforcement of intra-group guarantees, where the grantor, subsidiary company, has become insolvent afterwards. The same topics are constantly discussed: is the granting of the guarantee an act of disposal without consideration as regards the beneficiary group company? If the answer is in the negative, could it be contested as an act detrimental to the estate, positing the question ex-ante (at the time the guarantee was granted)? For some years after the enactment of the Spanish Insolvency Act ('IA') in 2003, courts hesitated as to the solution that these questions merited (see Supreme Court Judgments 791/2010 and 652/2012). In the end, one had the impression that almost every up-stream guarantee succumbed to the insolvency practitioner’s avoidance powers and that courts generally upheld the validity of down-stream guarantees. This outcome reveals the counterfactual insight of legal scholars and legal doctrine as to the phenomenon of the group of companies, when refusing to take an overall approach to this theme. Besides, the decisions were justified without taking into account whether or not there were group external creditors to be protected and whether the avoidance of the transaction was the optimal way of providing such protection.

Buy this article
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 45 / USD 55 / GBP 40
Buy this issue
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 165 / USD 220 / GBP 145
Buy annual subscription
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 520
If you are already a subscriber
log In here

International Corporate Rescue

"International Corporate Rescue is truly unique in its concept and an indispensable read."

Neil Cooper, Consultant at INSOL International

Join our mailing list

Join our mailing list to receive regular updates on latest issues and content.

Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.