Chase Cambria
  • Log in
  • Not a member yet?
go
  • Contact
  • Webmail
  • Archive
 
  • Home
  • Overview
  • Journal Issues
  • Subscriptions
  • Editorial Board
  • Author Guidelines

International Corporate Rescue

Journal Issues

  • Vol 1 (2004)
  • Vol 2 (2005)
  • Vol 3 (2006)
  • Vol 4 (2007)
  • Vol 5 (2008)
  • Vol 6 (2009)
  • Vol 7 (2010)
  • Vol 8 (2011)
  • Vol 9 (2012)
  • Vol 10 (2013)
  • Vol 11 (2014)
  • Vol 12 (2015)
  • Vol 13 (2016)
  • Vol 14 (2017)
  • Vol 15 (2018)
  • Vol 16 (2019)
  • Vol 17 (2020)
  • Vol 18 (2021)
  •         Issue 1
  •         Issue 2
  •         Issue 3
  •         Issue 4
  •         Issue 5
  •         Issue 6
  • Vol 19 (2022)
  • Vol 20 (2023)
  • Vol 21 (2024)
  • Vol 22 (2025)

Vol 18 (2021) - Issue 1

Article preview

ITG & Others v Glenella Properties Limited & Others [2020] GCA 043

Alison Ozanne, Partner, and Katharine Dean, Paralegal, Walkers, Guernsey, Channel Islands

Synopsis
The Guernsey Court of Appeal ('GCA') has recently upheld a judgment of the Royal Court in Guernsey (handed down in December 2019) in the long running ITG Limited & Ors v Glenella Properties Limited & Ors litigation. The claim, commenced by ITG Limited (formerly Investec Trust (Guernsey) Limited) and Bayeux Trustees Limited as former trustees of the Tchenguiz Discretionary Trust ('TDT') (the 'Former Trustees'), relates to a trust governed by the laws of Jersey. In particular, two discrete issues have been most recently considered by the GCA: (i) whether the effect of an assignment of certain debts was to extinguish or cancelled by way of merger of the rights and obligations of those debts; and (ii) the priority in which creditors of a trust are to be paid in the event of an insolvency.
This most recent decision of the GCA followed a series of earlier decisions by both the GCA and the Privy Council. Briefly, the GCA had earlier:
(i) found that, in relation to a trustee's liability to third parties, Article 32 of the Trusts (Jersey) Law 1984 ('TJL') was applicable to the relevant transactions and made findings as to its meaning and effect; and had
(ii) on an appeal by the fifth defendant, Rawlinson & Hunter Trustees SA (now Geneva Trust Company (GTC) S.A.) ('GTC') (the then trustee), upheld, the Royal Court's finding of no gross negligence by the Former Trustees and overturned the Royal Court's finding that the Former Trustees were subject to binding obligations and restitution to the fourth defendant, Oscatello Investments Limited.
In a decision handed down on 23 April 2018, the Privy Council determined the substantive issues between the parties. Now, in this article, we provide a summary of the background to the proceedings and outline their current status and what the latest ruling means for the parties and trustees and creditors at large.

Buy this article
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 55 / USD 60 / GBP 45
Buy this issue
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 175 / USD 230 / GBP 155
Buy annual subscription
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 560
If you are already a subscriber
log In here

International Corporate Rescue

"International Corporate Rescue is the ultimate legal and commercial guide through the maze of complex cross border insolvency and restructuring issues."

William Q Derrough, Managing Director and Co-head of Recapitalization & Restructuring Group, Moelis & Company, New York

 

 

Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.