Chase Cambria
  • Log in
  • Not a member yet?
go
  • Contact
  • Webmail
  • Archive
 
  • Home
  • Overview
  • Journal Issues
  • Subscriptions
  • Editorial Board
  • Author Guidelines

International Corporate Rescue

Journal Issues

  • Vol 1 (2004)
  • Vol 2 (2005)
  • Vol 3 (2006)
  • Vol 4 (2007)
  • Vol 5 (2008)
  • Vol 6 (2009)
  • Vol 7 (2010)
  • Vol 8 (2011)
  • Vol 9 (2012)
  • Vol 10 (2013)
  • Vol 11 (2014)
  • Vol 12 (2015)
  • Vol 13 (2016)
  • Vol 14 (2017)
  • Vol 15 (2018)
  • Vol 16 (2019)
  • Vol 17 (2020)
  • Vol 18 (2021)
  •         Issue 1
  •         Issue 2
  •         Issue 3
  •         Issue 4
  •         Issue 5
  •         Issue 6
  • Vol 19 (2022)
  • Vol 20 (2023)
  • Vol 21 (2024)
  • Vol 22 (2025)

Vol 18 (2021) - Issue 4

Article preview

Hat & Mitre PLC: Still in Administration (Despite Efforts from Majority Shareholders)

Charlotte Sandberg, Associate, and Emma Kemsley-Pein, Trainee Solicitor, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, London, UK

Synopsis
This is, in the court's own words, 'a most unusual' case, involving stakeholder standoffs, a difficult administration and procedural irregularities. The court's judgment provides welcome relief for the administrators of Hat & Mitre PLC (the 'Company') and interesting reading for those operating in the field of insolvency, holding that:
(a) the director who, as part of a directors' out-ofcourt administration application, made the statutory declaration on insolvency was entitled to take the view that the Company was insolvent, but had he not been so entitled, this would not have affected the validity of the administrators' appointment;
(b) the directors who exercised their power to appoint administrators did not do so for an improper purpose, but had they done so, this would have rendered the administrators' appointment voidable rather than void ab initio; and
(c) the administrators did not cause unfair harm to the Company's majority shareholders and that, if considering returning a balance sheet solvent company to solvency, administrators are right to:
(i) seek to ensure that any proposal for doing so will achieve the statutory objective of rescuing the company as a going concern; and (ii) consider the interests of all shareholders (including minority shareholders).

Buy this article
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 55 / USD 60 / GBP 45
Buy this issue
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 175 / USD 230 / GBP 155
Buy annual subscription
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 560
If you are already a subscriber
log In here

International Corporate Rescue

"International Corporate Rescue is the ultimate legal and commercial guide through the maze of complex cross border insolvency and restructuring issues."

William Q Derrough, Managing Director and Co-head of Recapitalization & Restructuring Group, Moelis & Company, New York

 

 

Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.