Chase Cambria
  • University of Technology Sydney
  • [Corporate Access] · Log in
go
  • Contact
  • Webmail
  • Archive
 
  • Home
  • Overview
  • Journal Issues
  • Special Issues
  • Subscriptions
  • Editorial Board
  • Author Guidelines

International Corporate Rescue

Journal Issues

  • Vol 1 (2004)
  • Vol 2 (2005)
  • Vol 3 (2006)
  • Vol 4 (2007)
  • Vol 5 (2008)
  • Vol 6 (2009)
  • Vol 7 (2010)
  • Vol 8 (2011)
  • Vol 9 (2012)
  • Vol 10 (2013)
  • Vol 11 (2014)
  • Vol 12 (2015)
  • Vol 13 (2016)
  • Vol 14 (2017)
  • Vol 15 (2018)
  • Vol 16 (2019)
  • Vol 17 (2020)
  • Vol 18 (2021)
  • Vol 19 (2022)
  •         Issue 1
  •         Issue 2
  •         Issue 3
  •         Issue 4
  •         Issue 5
  •         Issue 6
  • Vol 20 (2023)

Vol 19 (2022) - Issue 5

Article preview

Rushbrooke UK Ltd v 4 Design Concepts Ltd [2022] EWHC 1110 (Ch)

Jamie Murray Jones, Associate, and Annabel Kennard, Trainee Solicitor, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, London, UK

Synopsis
The Court struck out an application for an injunction to prevent a winding up petition on the basis that the solicitors purporting to act on behalf of the applicant company had not been properly instructed by the company. The solicitors’ instructions had come from only one of the two directors of the company, who alone did not have the authority to instruct solicitors on its behalf.

Buy this article
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 45 / USD 55 / GBP 40
Buy this issue
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 165 / USD 220 / GBP 145
Buy annual subscription
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 520

International Corporate Rescue

"Among a vast variety of insolvency and restructuring journals, International Corporate Rescue is unparalleled in its depth of coverage of issues relevant to practitioners in all corners of the globe today."

Paul Kirk, Collins Pitt Associates, Melbourne

 

 

Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.