Chase Cambria
  • Log in
  • Not a member yet?
go
  • Contact
  • Webmail
  • Archive
 
  • Home
  • Overview
  • Journal Issues
  • Subscriptions
  • Editorial Board
  • Author Guidelines

International Corporate Rescue

Journal Issues

  • Vol 1 (2004)
  • Vol 2 (2005)
  • Vol 3 (2006)
  •         Issue 1
  •         Issue 2
  •         Issue 3
  •         Issue 4
  •         Issue 5
  •         Issue 6
  • Vol 4 (2007)
  • Vol 5 (2008)
  • Vol 6 (2009)
  • Vol 7 (2010)
  • Vol 8 (2011)
  • Vol 9 (2012)
  • Vol 10 (2013)
  • Vol 11 (2014)
  • Vol 12 (2015)
  • Vol 13 (2016)
  • Vol 14 (2017)
  • Vol 15 (2018)
  • Vol 16 (2019)
  • Vol 17 (2020)
  • Vol 18 (2021)
  • Vol 19 (2022)
  • Vol 20 (2023)
  • Vol 21 (2024)
  • Vol 22 (2025)

Vol 3 (2006) - Issue 2

Article preview

The Valuation of Distressed Companies: A Conceptual Framework, Part I

Michael Crystal QC, 3-4 South Square, Gray’s Inn, London, UK; and Rizwaan Jameel Mokal, Barrister, 3-4 South Square, Gray’s Inn, London; Laws, UCL; Centre for Business Research, Cambridge University, UK

Introduction
It is often crucial to ascertain the value of a distressed company. Those interested in the company’s undertaking require this information to determine what should be done with the company’s business, and how the value in the company’s estate should be distributed among them. In this article, addressed primarily to the parties to corporate reorganisation proceedings in the UK and their advisers, we provide a conceptual framework within which these questions might be answered.
This, the first part of the article, identifies the bases on which a company’s business might be valued. Drawing upon economic theory, empirical evidence, and the sophisticated principles evolved by US courts with long experience of dealing with such issues, it explains the circumstances in which one or other of these bases might appropriately be adopted. The onset of corporate distress creates unique additional problems in attempting business valuations, whether carried out in a court context or out of court. Focusing particularly on the incentives of those interested in the outcome of reorganisation proceedings, the article seeks to distinguish between the ‘structural’ and the ‘strategic’ factors giving rise to these problems, and explains how these might impact upon the valuation process. It then draws on the US jurisprudence on business valuation to outline three methods for putting a value on a ‘going concern’. It is submitted that the principles developed by US courts will prove helpful and persuasive as UK courts grapple more and more frequently with valuation
issues.
The second part of the article, to be published in the following issue of this journal, consists of a detailed analysis of the recent judgment of the English High Court in In re MyTravel Group Plc, which is employed as a case study in the application of the conceptual framework laid down in the first part.

Buy this article
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 55 / USD 60 / GBP 45
Buy this issue
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 175 / USD 230 / GBP 155
Buy annual subscription
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 560
If you are already a subscriber
log In here

International Corporate Rescue

"International Corporate Rescue is truly unique in its concept and an indispensable read."

Neil Cooper, Consultant at INSOL International

 

 

Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.