Chase Cambria
  • Log in
  • Not a member yet?
go
  • Contact
  • Webmail
  • Archive
 
  • Home
  • Overview
  • Journal Issues
  • Subscriptions
  • Editorial Board
  • Author Guidelines

International Corporate Rescue

Journal Issues

  • Vol 1 (2004)
  • Vol 2 (2005)
  • Vol 3 (2006)
  • Vol 4 (2007)
  • Vol 5 (2008)
  • Vol 6 (2009)
  • Vol 7 (2010)
  • Vol 8 (2011)
  • Vol 9 (2012)
  • Vol 10 (2013)
  • Vol 11 (2014)
  • Vol 12 (2015)
  • Vol 13 (2016)
  • Vol 14 (2017)
  •         Issue 1
  •         Issue 2
  •         Issue 3
  •         Issue 4
  •         Issue 5
  •         Issue 6
  • Vol 15 (2018)
  • Vol 16 (2019)
  • Vol 17 (2020)
  • Vol 18 (2021)
  • Vol 19 (2022)
  • Vol 20 (2023)
  • Vol 21 (2024)
  • Vol 22 (2025)

Vol 14 (2017) - Issue 5

Article preview

The Proposed EU Directive on Preventive Restructuring Frameworks

Edoardo Lupi, Barrister, South Square, London, UK

Introduction
In November 2016, the European Commission issued a proposal for a Directive on preventive restructuring frameworks, second chance and measures to increase the efficiency of restructuring, insolvency and discharge (the 'Proposed Directive'). This article seeks to (i) explain the policy aims underlying the Proposed Directive; (ii) summarise the Proposed Directive's key elements, in particular, the proposals for restructuring frameworks across Member States to share certain core elements and minimum standards; (iii) consider the areas in which the Proposed Directive may require some further work; and (iv) consider the likely impact of the Proposed Directive on the UK both in terms of its obligations as an EU Member State (for the time being) and, following the UK's exit from the EU and implementation of the Proposed Directive by the remaining Member States, on the UK's prospects of remaining a global restructuring hub.

The UK may well never have to implement the Proposed Directive due to the legislative steps which still need to be completed. However, the UK is nevertheless still likely to face increased pressures to reform its own restructuring frameworks, particularly the creditors' voluntary arrangement and the scheme of arrangement jurisdiction, the latter of which has stood largely unchanged for over a century.

Pressures for reform do not stem solely from the EU's latest proposals. The Proposed Directive should be seen in its international context, in which a number of jurisdictions have already made moves to overhaul their existing restructuring regimes. Recently (and most notably) Singapore enacted the Companies (Amendment) Act 2017 which, in addition to incorporating the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency, has made extensive amendments to the Singaporean scheme of arrangement jurisdiction under Part VII of the Companies Act (Cap 50 of the 2006 Revised Edition)(the 'Revised SCA').

Buy this article
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 55 / USD 60 / GBP 45
Buy this issue
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 175 / USD 230 / GBP 155
Buy annual subscription
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 560
If you are already a subscriber
log In here

International Corporate Rescue

"International Corporate Rescue is a brilliant resource. The articles are always informative and interesting. It helps to keep me up to date with developments in insolvency and restructuring, both in England and many other jurisdictions."

Charlotte Cooke, Barrister, South Square

 

 

Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.