International Corporate Rescue
Journal Issues
- Vol 1 (2004)
- Vol 2 (2005)
- Vol 3 (2006)
- Vol 4 (2007)
- Vol 5 (2008)
- Vol 6 (2009)
- Vol 7 (2010)
- Vol 8 (2011)
- Vol 9 (2012)
- Vol 10 (2013)
- Vol 11 (2014)
- Vol 12 (2015)
- Vol 13 (2016)
- Vol 14 (2017)
- Vol 15 (2018)
- Vol 16 (2019)
- Vol 17 (2020)
- Vol 18 (2021)
- Issue 1
- Issue 2
- Issue 3
- Issue 4
- Issue 5
- Issue 6
- Vol 19 (2022)
- Vol 20 (2023)
- Vol 21 (2024)
Vol 18 (2021) - Issue 4
Article preview
Re Seabrook Road Ltd
Lynette Ebo, Associate, and Deniz Sezer, Trainee, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, London, UKSynopsis
In Re Seabrook Road Ltd 1 the High Court provided guidance on the considerations the court takes into account when determining whether an out of court appointment of an administrator is valid. The court held that not only is it necessary for a notice of intention to appoint an administrator (a 'NOITA') to be validly served, but there also has to be a genuine and settled intention to appoint an administrator. In Re Seabrook it was held that neither of these factors were present, with the effect that the company's purported NOITA was invalid and the company was unable to benefit from the interim moratorium imposed by paragraph 44 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 (the 'Insolvency Act').
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 55 / USD 60 / GBP 45
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 175 / USD 230 / GBP 155
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 560
log In here
Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.
