International Corporate Rescue
Journal Issues
- Vol 1 (2004)
- Vol 2 (2005)
- Vol 3 (2006)
- Vol 4 (2007)
- Vol 5 (2008)
- Vol 6 (2009)
- Vol 7 (2010)
- Vol 8 (2011)
- Vol 9 (2012)
- Vol 10 (2013)
- Vol 11 (2014)
- Vol 12 (2015)
- Vol 13 (2016)
- Vol 14 (2017)
- Vol 15 (2018)
- Vol 16 (2019)
- Vol 17 (2020)
- Vol 18 (2021)
- Issue 1
- Issue 2
- Issue 3
- Issue 4
- Issue 5
- Issue 6
- Vol 19 (2022)
- Vol 20 (2023)
- Vol 21 (2024)
- Vol 22 (2025)
Vol 18 (2021) - Issue 6
Article preview
Navigating Potential Risks for Insolvency Practitioners in Administration Sales: Uralkali v Rowley and another [2020] EWHC 3442 (Ch)
Nicholas Cooper, Associate, and Sam Rigney, Associate, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, London, UKSynopsis
In Uralkali v Rowley and another, in what is a helpful judgment for insolvency officeholders, the High Court provided guidance on a number of important issues regularly faced by practitioners, including whether they owe a duty of care to participants in a sales process out of an insolvent estate. In dismissing all claims against the Administrators of FI, the High Court confirmed that it is unlikely that an officeholder would be found to owe a duty of care in the context of an ordinary course sales process.
Buy this article
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 55 / USD 60 / GBP 45
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 55 / USD 60 / GBP 45
Buy this issue
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 175 / USD 230 / GBP 155
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 175 / USD 230 / GBP 155
Buy annual subscription
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 560
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 560
If you are already a subscriber
log In here
log In here
Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.
