Chase Cambria
  • Log in
  • Not a member yet?
go
  • Contact
  • Webmail
  • Archive
 
  • Home
  • Overview
  • Journal Issues
  • Subscriptions
  • Editorial Board
  • Author Guidelines

International Corporate Rescue

Journal Issues

  • Vol 1 (2004)
  • Vol 2 (2005)
  • Vol 3 (2006)
  •         Issue 1
  •         Issue 2
  •         Issue 3
  •         Issue 4
  •         Issue 5
  •         Issue 6
  • Vol 4 (2007)
  • Vol 5 (2008)
  • Vol 6 (2009)
  • Vol 7 (2010)
  • Vol 8 (2011)
  • Vol 9 (2012)
  • Vol 10 (2013)
  • Vol 11 (2014)
  • Vol 12 (2015)
  • Vol 13 (2016)
  • Vol 14 (2017)
  • Vol 15 (2018)
  • Vol 16 (2019)
  • Vol 17 (2020)
  • Vol 18 (2021)
  • Vol 19 (2022)
  • Vol 20 (2023)
  • Vol 21 (2024)
  • Vol 22 (2025)

Vol 3 (2006) - Issue 2

Article preview

Spain: Understanding the New Insolvency Law

Jesús Almoguera, Partner, Ashurst, Madrid, Spain

I. Introduction
In the previous issue of International Corporate Rescue (Volume 2, Issue 4, 2005) we summarised the most significant changes in Spanish insolvency law as a result of the new Law 22/2003, of 9 July 2003, which entered into force as of 1 September 2004 (the ‘Insolvency Law’).
In the next issues of International Corporate Rescue we will elaborate on some of those changes in more depth and we will comment on significant judgements and other important issues which may help shed some more light on the Insolvency Law in more practical terms. In this issue, we will comment on two particular aspects of the Insolvency Law which have dramatically changed the way insolvency proceedings work in Spain.
II. Claw-back provisions
As we said in the previous issue of International Corporate Rescue, the claw-back provisions of the new Insolvency Law have reduced legal uncertainty to a great extent, in particular because now there is a clear claw-back period of two years prior to the declaration of insolvency; therefore, acts carried out before that period cannot be challenged on the grounds of the Insolvency Law.
However, the new regime is far from being clear, as a recent judgement of a Spanish commercial court has proven.
The findings of this judgement must be borne in mind in any refinancing transaction or when restructuring the debt of a group of companies and, in particular, in the steps affecting the debt restructurings that normally follow a LBO transaction.
In our opinion, the judgment goes too far in the application of article 71 of the Insolvency Law. However, it is an important judgement because it is the first (or at least one of first) in which a refinancing deal is analysed under the Insolvency Law. It also reveals a fact that is often disregarded by transactional lawyers: judges tend to apply the law with ‘common sense’ rather than using sophisticated theories that might sometimes make it very difficult to identify the real risks that some complicated deals entail.

Buy this article
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 55 / USD 60 / GBP 45
Buy this issue
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 175 / USD 230 / GBP 155
Buy annual subscription
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 560
If you are already a subscriber
log In here

International Corporate Rescue

"International Corporate Rescue is truly unique in its concept and an indispensable read."

Neil Cooper, Consultant at INSOL International

 

 

Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.