Chase Cambria
  • Log in
  • Not a member yet?
go
  • Contact
  • Webmail
  • Archive
 
  • Home
  • Overview
  • Journal Issues
  • Subscriptions
  • Editorial Board
  • Author Guidelines

International Corporate Rescue

Journal Issues

  • Vol 1 (2004)
  • Vol 2 (2005)
  • Vol 3 (2006)
  • Vol 4 (2007)
  • Vol 5 (2008)
  • Vol 6 (2009)
  • Vol 7 (2010)
  • Vol 8 (2011)
  • Vol 9 (2012)
  • Vol 10 (2013)
  • Vol 11 (2014)
  • Vol 12 (2015)
  • Vol 13 (2016)
  • Vol 14 (2017)
  • Vol 15 (2018)
  • Vol 16 (2019)
  • Vol 17 (2020)
  • Vol 18 (2021)
  • Vol 19 (2022)
  • Vol 20 (2023)
  •         Issue 1
  •         Issue 2
  •         Issue 3
  •         Issue 4
  •         Issue 5
  •         Issue 6
  • Vol 21 (2024)
  • Vol 22 (2025)

Vol 20 (2023) - Issue 5

Article preview

English Court Approves First 'Unsecured Credit Bid', in Administration of Sova Capital

Kate Stephenson, Partner, Kirkland & Ellis International LLP, London, UK

Synopsis
The English Court approved the first 'unsecured credit bid', in the special administration of Sova Capital.
The court granted Sova's administrators permission to enter into the sale of Russian securities (representing the bulk of Sova's estate) to an unsecured creditor, in consideration for that creditor waiving its claim against Sova.
In categorising the transaction as a 'sale' to a creditor rather than a 'distribution', the court found that the pari passu principle (which requires equal treatment of unsecured creditors in insolvency) did not apply.
The court's judgment provides detailed guidance as to the methodology used to value the unsecured credit bid. Notably, the sale consideration was evaluated on the basis of the dividend that the buyer would have received in the administration had the transaction not taken place; it was not calculated on the basis of the full value of the buyer's claim.
Although the nominal value of the relevant securities (c. £274 million) was higher than the amount of the buyer's c. £233 million unsecured claim, various Russia-related factors made the realisable value of securities far lower.
The case was opposed by another unsecured creditor (and competing bidder).

Buy this article
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 55 / USD 60 / GBP 45
Buy this issue
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 175 / USD 230 / GBP 155
Buy annual subscription
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 560
If you are already a subscriber
log In here

International Corporate Rescue

"I see a lot of corporate restructuring publications but International Corporate Rescue has struck the right balance of case studies and new technical issues, all wrapped up in a very reader-friendly style."

Alan Bloom, Head of Restructuring, EY, London

 

 

Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.