Chase Cambria
  • Log in
  • Not a member yet?
go
  • Contact
  • Webmail
  • Archive
 
  • Home
  • Overview
  • Journal Issues
  • Subscriptions
  • Editorial Board
  • Author Guidelines

International Corporate Rescue

Journal Issues

  • Vol 1 (2004)
  • Vol 2 (2005)
  • Vol 3 (2006)
  • Vol 4 (2007)
  • Vol 5 (2008)
  • Vol 6 (2009)
  • Vol 7 (2010)
  • Vol 8 (2011)
  • Vol 9 (2012)
  • Vol 10 (2013)
  • Vol 11 (2014)
  • Vol 12 (2015)
  • Vol 13 (2016)
  • Vol 14 (2017)
  • Vol 15 (2018)
  • Vol 16 (2019)
  • Vol 17 (2020)
  • Vol 18 (2021)
  • Vol 19 (2022)
  • Vol 20 (2023)
  • Vol 21 (2024)
  • Vol 22 (2025)
  •         Issue 1
  •         Issue 2

Vol 22 (2025) - Issue 2

Article preview

Serta Provides an Important Roadmap for Litigation Stemming from Liability Management Transactions

Brian Lohan, Partner, Maja Zerjal Fink, Partner, and Madelyn Nicolini, Associate, Clifford Chance, New York, USA

Synopsis
The past few years have been marked by a rise in aggressive non-pro rata liability management exercises,
especially in the United States. Such exercises do not treat all lenders equally, and many were challenged
by lenders that did not have the chance to participate.
One of the most notable (and litigated) examples of this trend is the transaction undertaken by Serta Simmons Bedding, L.L.C. and its affiliates (collectively, 'Serta'), which underscores the complexities and legal disputes arising from such transactions.
After more than four years of litigation in multiple courts, on the last day of 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (the 'Fifth Circuit') issued its much-anticipated ruling on Serta's 2020 uptier transaction (the '2020 Uptier Transaction' or the 'Transaction') with certain of Serta's existing lenders.
Reversing on appeal the decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (the 'Bankruptcy Court'), the Fifth Circuit found the 2020 Uptier Transaction violated Serta's 2016 credit agreement (the '2016 Credit Agreement') as the 2020 Uptier Transaction was not a permissible ‘open market purchase’ under an exception to the pro rata sharing provision of the 2016 Credit Agreement and held that certain provisions of Serta's plan of reorganisation (the 'Plan') – including an indemnity provision in favour of the participating lenders in the 2020 Uptier Transaction – were in violation of the Bankruptcy Code.

Buy this article
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 55 / USD 60 / GBP 45
Buy this issue
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 175 / USD 230 / GBP 155
Buy annual subscription
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 560
If you are already a subscriber
log In here

International Corporate Rescue

"Among a vast variety of insolvency and restructuring journals, International Corporate Rescue is unparalleled in its depth of coverage of issues relevant to practitioners in all corners of the globe today."

Paul Kirk, Collins Pitt Associates, Melbourne

 

 

Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.