Chase Cambria
  • Log in
  • Not a member yet?
go
  • Contact
  • Webmail
  • Archive
 
  • Home
  • Overview
  • Journal Issues
  • Subscriptions
  • Editorial Board
  • Author Guidelines

International Corporate Rescue

Journal Issues

  • Vol 1 (2004)
  • Vol 2 (2005)
  •         Issue 1
  •         Issue 2
  •         Issue 3
  •         Issue 4
  •         Issue 5
  •         Issue 6
  • Vol 3 (2006)
  • Vol 4 (2007)
  • Vol 5 (2008)
  • Vol 6 (2009)
  • Vol 7 (2010)
  • Vol 8 (2011)
  • Vol 9 (2012)
  • Vol 10 (2013)
  • Vol 11 (2014)
  • Vol 12 (2015)
  • Vol 13 (2016)
  • Vol 14 (2017)
  • Vol 15 (2018)
  • Vol 16 (2019)
  • Vol 17 (2020)
  • Vol 18 (2021)
  • Vol 19 (2022)
  • Vol 20 (2023)
  • Vol 21 (2024)
  • Vol 22 (2025)

Vol 2 (2005) - Issue 5

Article preview

Abolition of Tax Priorities in Germany: A Myth?

Daniel Dürrschmidt, Research Assistant, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany

Introduction

Tax priorities are provisions which privilege tax claims of tax authorities over other unsecured claims of ordinary creditors in the course of insolvency proceedings. Normally, only secured creditors enjoy priority treatment whereas unsecured creditors are treated equally (pari passu principle), i.e., their claims are settled proportionately. This principle is also embodied in German insolvency law.
Given high budget deficits, many governments may consider revenue as a justification to provide for ‘tax priorities’. Accordingly, tax priority rules can be found in many jurisdictions. However, some countries have overcome the temptation of increasing their revenue through preferential treatment of tax claims in insolvency proceedings. Germany is one of the countries that ‘officially’ abolished tax priorities in its insolvency law. A closer look at the German legal system, however, reveals provisions allowing tax authorities to cover tax claims totally, or at least at a better proportion than they would according to the pari passu principle. Such provisions have been named ‘backdoor’ tax priorities.
This article will outline the legal position as regards statutory and ‘backdoor’ tax priorities in Germany. A conclusion closes the article.

Statutory tax priorities

The German Insolvency Act (Insolvenzordnung; hereinafter: InsO) does not provide for a priority of tax claims, as did its predecessor, the Bankruptcy Act (hereinafter: KO) which was replaced with effect from 1999. The KO stipulated that tax claims rank before ordinary unsecured claims (Fiskusprivileg). The effect was that little or nothing was left for unsecured creditors. Now, German tax authorities are to be treated equally with all other unsecured creditors.
The treatment of the expenses of liquidation (Masseverbindlichkeiten) is not a substantive exception to the pari passu principle, although it developed as an exception to the principle of equal treatment of creditors.

Buy this article
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 55 / USD 60 / GBP 45
Buy this issue
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 175 / USD 230 / GBP 155
Buy annual subscription
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 560
If you are already a subscriber
log In here

International Corporate Rescue

"International Corporate Rescue is the ultimate legal and commercial guide through the maze of complex cross border insolvency and restructuring issues."

William Q Derrough, Managing Director and Co-head of Recapitalization & Restructuring Group, Moelis & Company, New York

 

 

Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.