Chase Cambria
  • Log in
  • Not a member yet?
go
  • Contact
  • Webmail
  • Archive
 
  • Home
  • Overview
  • Journal Issues
  • Subscriptions
  • Editorial Board
  • Author Guidelines

International Corporate Rescue

Journal Issues

  • Vol 1 (2004)
  • Vol 2 (2005)
  • Vol 3 (2006)
  •         Issue 1
  •         Issue 2
  •         Issue 3
  •         Issue 4
  •         Issue 5
  •         Issue 6
  • Vol 4 (2007)
  • Vol 5 (2008)
  • Vol 6 (2009)
  • Vol 7 (2010)
  • Vol 8 (2011)
  • Vol 9 (2012)
  • Vol 10 (2013)
  • Vol 11 (2014)
  • Vol 12 (2015)
  • Vol 13 (2016)
  • Vol 14 (2017)
  • Vol 15 (2018)
  • Vol 16 (2019)
  • Vol 17 (2020)
  • Vol 18 (2021)
  • Vol 19 (2022)
  • Vol 20 (2023)
  • Vol 21 (2024)
  • Vol 22 (2025)

Vol 3 (2006) - Issue 3

Article preview

The Insolvency of Van Der Hoop Bankiers: EU Banking Law in Action

Paul Kuipers, Lawyer and Mees Roelofs, Lawyer, Simmons & Simmons, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

1. Introduction
Even though banking probably goes back to the Babylonians,humans have traditionally retained their money themselves. Only relatively recently have people started to bring their money to banks, based on nothing more than an obligation by that bank to return the same amount. And since individuals and companies are willing to save their money with a bank, banks are in a position to re-invest. This process largely keeps modern economies going.
The very basis of that process is, however, the people’s trust that their bank will return an amount equal to the amount saved (but not necessarily the same coins and banknotes). If a bank defaults on that basic obligation, the eventual result may very well be that the account holders lose all their money. Insolvency of a bank is a systematic risk and therefore potentially has a much bigger impact on the economy than insolvency of an individual or an “ordinary” company. Throughout modern history, depressions – local and global – only became really serious when banks started to default. States realise that there is a need to prevent banks from defaulting and to intervene with defaulting banks in order to prevent deterioration.
Nowadays, there is a network of banking supervision instruments. Virtually every jurisdiction has its own credit supervision rules. On an international level, the Basel Accords impose certain standards upon banks. Within the European Union, banking supervision has to a large degree been harmonised. This has been done in the form of directives, which have been implemented by means of national credit supervision laws. The use of directives has left considerable space for the member states to enact special provisions for particular situations not covered by EU law. In the period between 1977 and 2000, the EU has mainly established rules as to the minimum capital, solvency ratios and the internal organisation a bank should have. These have now been codified in the Consolidated Banking Directive. In 2001, Directive 2001/24 on the Reorganisation and Winding Up of Credit Institutions (the Reorganisation Directive) was adopted.

Buy this article
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 55 / USD 60 / GBP 45
Buy this issue
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 175 / USD 230 / GBP 155
Buy annual subscription
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 560
If you are already a subscriber
log In here

International Corporate Rescue

"International Corporate Rescue is great. In a busy world, it covers a truly global range of restructuring topics in just the right depth, enough for an understanding of the important points, but not a lengthy mini-PhD. I find it really helpful for keeping informed about the areas I work in, and to have ‘issue awareness’ about areas further afield. I always read it."

Richard Tett, Freshfields, London Head of Restructuring & Insolvency

 

 

Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.