Chase Cambria
  • Log in
  • Not a member yet?
go
  • Contact
  • Webmail
  • Archive
 
  • Home
  • Overview
  • Journal Issues
  • Subscriptions
  • Editorial Board
  • Author Guidelines

International Corporate Rescue

Journal Issues

  • Vol 1 (2004)
  • Vol 2 (2005)
  • Vol 3 (2006)
  • Vol 4 (2007)
  • Vol 5 (2008)
  • Vol 6 (2009)
  • Vol 7 (2010)
  • Vol 8 (2011)
  • Vol 9 (2012)
  • Vol 10 (2013)
  •         Issue 1
  •         Issue 2
  •         Issue 3
  •         Issue 4
  •         Issue 5
  •         Issue 6
  • Vol 11 (2014)
  • Vol 12 (2015)
  • Vol 13 (2016)
  • Vol 14 (2017)
  • Vol 15 (2018)
  • Vol 16 (2019)
  • Vol 17 (2020)
  • Vol 18 (2021)
  • Vol 19 (2022)
  • Vol 20 (2023)
  • Vol 21 (2024)
  • Vol 22 (2025)

Vol 10 (2013) - Issue 2

Article preview

What Fiscal Policy?

Kathleen Stephansen, Senior Investment Strategist, AIG Asset Management, New York, USA

Automatic spending cuts became a reality. How dire will it be? USD 85 billion in automatic spending cuts will go into effect on March 1, as no compromise was reached as of this writing. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the drag on growth from sequestration to be 0.6ppt of GDP, for a total fiscal restraint of 1-1.5ppt of GDP in the current fiscal year. This brings GDP growth below 2% this year, following 2.2% in 2012 and 1.8% in 2011. The effect of the spending cuts will start to be felt a month or so from now, as it takes time to organize pay cuts and furloughs. Relative to the average recovery in post-WWII, it is the first time that 8 and 12 quarters into the recovery, fiscal restraint sets in (circled in Exhibit 1).
The Budget Control Act of 2011 had adopted spending caps on discretionary spending (39% of total spending – Exhibit 2). It also called for the USD 85 billion automatic spending cuts, half from defence (20% of total spending) and half from non-defence spending if no agreement was reached on an additional USD 1.5 trillion in budget cuts over 10 years.
Since the Act stipulated that the mandatory spending category (55% of total spending), Social Security and Medicaid programs be exempted and cuts to Medicare limited, the burden of the non-defence spending cuts will disproportionately fall on discretionary spending, which represents only 19% of total spending. As a result, 71% of the spending cuts will likely be concentrated in discretionary spending and 13% in non-exempt mandatory spending.

Buy this article
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 55 / USD 60 / GBP 45
Buy this issue
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 175 / USD 230 / GBP 155
Buy annual subscription
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 560
If you are already a subscriber
log In here

International Corporate Rescue

"International Corporate Rescue is a must-have of the most current substantive law developments in restructuring and insolvency law. Covering legislative overviews and novelties, case reviews and analyses of cross-border controversies, it is a concise, accessible and insightful collection of leading articles from respected lawyers and academics from all over the world."

Prof. Em. Bob Wessels, University of Leiden, Leiden

 

 

Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.