Chase Cambria
  • Log in
  • Not a member yet?
go
  • Contact
  • Webmail
  • Archive
 
  • Home
  • Overview
  • Journal Issues
  • Subscriptions
  • Editorial Board
  • Author Guidelines

International Corporate Rescue

Journal Issues

  • Vol 1 (2004)
  • Vol 2 (2005)
  • Vol 3 (2006)
  • Vol 4 (2007)
  • Vol 5 (2008)
  • Vol 6 (2009)
  • Vol 7 (2010)
  • Vol 8 (2011)
  • Vol 9 (2012)
  • Vol 10 (2013)
  • Vol 11 (2014)
  • Vol 12 (2015)
  • Vol 13 (2016)
  • Vol 14 (2017)
  • Vol 15 (2018)
  • Vol 16 (2019)
  • Vol 17 (2020)
  • Vol 18 (2021)
  • Vol 19 (2022)
  •         Issue 1
  •         Issue 2
  •         Issue 3
  •         Issue 4
  •         Issue 5
  •         Issue 6
  • Vol 20 (2023)
  • Vol 21 (2024)
  • Vol 22 (2025)

Vol 19 (2022) - Issue 3

Article preview

What’s Done Is Done: Bankruptcy Court Rejects Attempt to Reopen Chapter 11 Case to Reallocate Value – In re NorthEast Gas Generation, LLC (Bankr. D Del)

Scott C. Shelley, Of Counsel, Paul Hastings LLP, New York, USA

Synopsis
In NorthEast Gas, the court rejected a request to reopen a chapter 11 case to permit the reorganised company to increase the amount of debt reinstated under its chapter 11 plan. The court premised its ruling on the well-established principle that once a chapter 11 plan is confirmed and substantially consummated, the
Bankruptcy Code prohibits modification of the plan.
The reorganised debtors had characterised the relief they sought as a permissible adjustment to the allowed amount of a claim. Despite that characterisation, and the fact that no stakeholder had objected, the Court determined that the relief requested would effect a reallocation of value under the plan, which constituted an impermissible, post-consummation plan modification.
NorthEast Gas makes clear that once a plan has been substantially consummated, the plan is final, and courts will not countenance attempts to modify the plan to reallocate value. In dicta, the court noted that a post-consummation modification may be permitted if the confirmed plan already includes a mechanism to implement the modification. Going forward, parties seeking optionality may be incentivised to include such mechanisms in their chapter 11 plans.

Buy this article
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 55 / USD 60 / GBP 45
Buy this issue
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 175 / USD 230 / GBP 155
Buy annual subscription
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 560
If you are already a subscriber
log In here

International Corporate Rescue

"I see a lot of corporate restructuring publications but International Corporate Rescue has struck the right balance of case studies and new technical issues, all wrapped up in a very reader-friendly style."

Alan Bloom, Head of Restructuring, EY, London

 

 

Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.