Chase Cambria
  • University of Technology Sydney
  • [Corporate Access] · Log in
go
  • Contact
  • Webmail
  • Archive
 
  • Home
  • Overview
  • Journal Issues
  • Special Issues
  • Subscriptions
  • Editorial Board
  • Author Guidelines

International Corporate Rescue

Journal Issues

  • Vol 1 (2004)
  • Vol 2 (2005)
  • Vol 3 (2006)
  • Vol 4 (2007)
  • Vol 5 (2008)
  • Vol 6 (2009)
  • Vol 7 (2010)
  • Vol 8 (2011)
  • Vol 9 (2012)
  • Vol 10 (2013)
  • Vol 11 (2014)
  • Vol 12 (2015)
  • Vol 13 (2016)
  • Vol 14 (2017)
  • Vol 15 (2018)
  • Vol 16 (2019)
  • Vol 17 (2020)
  • Vol 18 (2021)
  • Vol 19 (2022)
  •         Issue 1
  •         Issue 2
  •         Issue 3
  •         Issue 4
  •         Issue 5
  •         Issue 6
  • Vol 20 (2023)

Vol 19 (2022) - Issue 6

Article preview

A Comparative Analysis of Systemic Risk and Economic Growth within the Context of Banking – Part 2

asvir Singh Nandra, Brunel University, London, UK

Synopsis
Part 1 of this article explored the effectiveness of pre-crisis regulation in mitigating systemic risk and the economic growth of financial institutions, to the post-crisis period. These comparisons demonstrated that post-crisis regulatory changes were sufficient at mitigating systemic risk in a theoretical sense. It also established that the economic growth of financial institutions is not hindered to a serve degree, thus allowing them to act as instruments for the economy.
This continuation article provides a practical insight into whether or not the theory established in Part 1 can effectively work in practice. In so doing, it shows that post-crisis regulation is sufficient at mitigating systemic risk, with the use of practical case studies. It also demonstrates that although post-crisis regulation does not hinder economic growth to a serve degree, oppressive punishment for non-compliance of such regulation does severely hinder economic growth. The first section utilises a case study of Northern Rock and Metro Bank to compare both pre/post-crisis periods and their effectiveness of mitigating systemic risk. The second section looks at the oppressive punishments associated with non-compliance of post-crisis regulation. This identifies the only drawback of the post-crisis period. Final conclusions are then drawn based on the results of the analysis.

Buy this article
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 45 / USD 55 / GBP 40
Buy this issue
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 165 / USD 220 / GBP 145
Buy annual subscription
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 520

International Corporate Rescue

"International Corporate Rescue is great. In a busy world, it covers a truly global range of restructuring topics in just the right depth, enough for an understanding of the important points, but not a lengthy mini-PhD. I find it really helpful for keeping informed about the areas I work in, and to have ‘issue awareness’ about areas further afield. I always read it."

Richard Tett, Freshfields, London Head of Restructuring & Insolvency

 

 

Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.