International Corporate Rescue
Journal Issues
- Vol 1 (2004)
- Vol 2 (2005)
- Vol 3 (2006)
- Vol 4 (2007)
- Vol 5 (2008)
- Vol 6 (2009)
- Vol 7 (2010)
- Vol 8 (2011)
- Vol 9 (2012)
- Vol 10 (2013)
- Vol 11 (2014)
- Vol 12 (2015)
- Vol 13 (2016)
- Vol 14 (2017)
- Vol 15 (2018)
- Vol 16 (2019)
- Vol 17 (2020)
- Vol 18 (2021)
- Vol 19 (2022)
- Vol 20 (2023)
- Vol 21 (2024)
- Issue 1
- Issue 2
- Issue 3
- Issue 4
- Issue 5
- Issue 6
- Vol 22 (2025)
Vol 21 (2024) - Issue 6
Article preview
PlusHolding GmbH, Re [2024] EWHC 828 (Ch)
Adam Jones, Senior Associate, and Georgia Spyrou, Trainee Associate (non-solicitor), Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, London, UKSynopsis
The English High Court (the 'Court') sanctioned a scheme of arrangement under the Companies Act 2006 Part 26 (a 'scheme'), where the scheme had been modified after the creditors' meeting had approved it.
The scheme creditors had approved the scheme subject to any modifications, additions or conditions imposed by the Court. The Court noted that the modifications to the scheme were more than merely technical, but was satisfied that: (i) the modified scheme achieved effectively the same economic outcome for scheme creditors; (ii) scheme creditors would have approved the modified scheme if it had been presented to them at the creditors' meeting; and (iii) the Court was not 'foisting on creditors a different scheme'.
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 55 / USD 60 / GBP 45
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 175 / USD 230 / GBP 155
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 560
log In here
Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.
