Chase Cambria
  • Log in
  • Not a member yet?
go
  • Contact
  • Webmail
  • Archive
 
  • Home
  • Overview
  • Journal Issues
  • Special Issues
  • Subscriptions
  • Editorial Board
  • Author Guidelines

International Corporate Rescue

Journal Issues

  • Vol 1 (2004)
  • Vol 2 (2005)
  • Vol 3 (2006)
  • Vol 4 (2007)
  • Vol 5 (2008)
  • Vol 6 (2009)
  • Vol 7 (2010)
  • Vol 8 (2011)
  • Vol 9 (2012)
  • Vol 10 (2013)
  • Vol 11 (2014)
  • Vol 12 (2015)
  • Vol 13 (2016)
  • Vol 14 (2017)
  • Vol 15 (2018)
  • Vol 16 (2019)
  • Vol 17 (2020)
  • Vol 18 (2021)
  • Vol 19 (2022)
  • Vol 20 (2023)
  • Vol 21 (2024)
  • Vol 22 (2025)
  • Vol 23 (2026)
  •         Issue 1
  •         Issue 2

Vol 23 (2026) - Issue 2

Article preview

From Liquidation to Completion: The Transformative Role of Reverse Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

Dr Shefali Sethi, CS, Assistant Professor, Banarsidas Chandiwala Institute of Professional Studies, and Dr S.K. Gupta, Managing Director, ICMAI Registered Valuers Organisation, New Delhi, India

Synopsis
The Reverse Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (Reverse CIRP) has developed as a judicially established process inside India’s insolvency framework to tackle the distinct challenges of halted real-estate projects.
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 establishes a systematic framework for addressing corporate distress via the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP); however, its traditional implementation frequently falls short in safeguarding the interests of homebuyers, who are now acknowledged as financial creditors. Reverse CIRP aims to prioritise project completion rather than liquidation by permitting promoters or third-party financiers to inject capital solely for the completion of outstanding real estate projects, under the oversight of an insolvency professional and the Committee of Creditors (CoC). This study examines significant judicial interventions such as Flat Buyers Association v Umang Realtech Pvt. Ltd., Rajesh Goyal v Babita Gupta, and Anand Murti v Soni Infratech Pvt. Ltd., elucidating the evolution, logic, and operational parameters of this theory. The system has enabled prompt unit delivery and improved consumer protection; nevertheless, it also presents issues regarding promoter eligibility, transparency, fund governance, and the lack of regulatory codification. The report advocates for the official legislative integration of Reverse CIRP, linkage with RERA, improved monitoring and accountability frameworks, and capacity enhancement for insolvency professionals. Ultimately, Reverse CIRP signifies a transformative yet transitional methodology that redirects attention from asset liquidation to stakeholder focused resolution, particularly for homebuyers, and emphasises the necessity for a comprehensive statutory and regulatory framework to guarantee consistency, equity, and long-term effectiveness in real estate insolvency matters.

Buy this article
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 55 / USD 60 / GBP 45
Buy this issue
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 175 / USD 230 / GBP 155
Buy annual subscription
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 560
If you are already a subscriber
log In here

International Corporate Rescue

"International Corporate Rescue is the ultimate legal and commercial guide through the maze of complex cross border insolvency and restructuring issues."

William Q Derrough, Managing Director and Co-head of Recapitalization & Restructuring Group, Moelis & Company, New York

 

 

Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.