Chase Cambria
  • Log in
  • Not a member yet?
go
  • Contact
  • Webmail
  • Archive
 
  • Home
  • Overview
  • Journal Issues
  • Special Issues
  • Subscriptions
  • Editorial Board
  • Author Guidelines

International Corporate Rescue

Journal Issues

  • Vol 1 (2004)
  • Vol 2 (2005)
  • Vol 3 (2006)
  • Vol 4 (2007)
  • Vol 5 (2008)
  • Vol 6 (2009)
  • Vol 7 (2010)
  • Vol 8 (2011)
  • Vol 9 (2012)
  • Vol 10 (2013)
  • Vol 11 (2014)
  • Vol 12 (2015)
  • Vol 13 (2016)
  • Vol 14 (2017)
  • Vol 15 (2018)
  • Vol 16 (2019)
  • Vol 17 (2020)
  • Vol 18 (2021)
  • Vol 19 (2022)
  • Vol 20 (2023)
  • Vol 21 (2024)
  • Vol 22 (2025)
  • Vol 23 (2026)
  •         Issue 1
  •         Issue 2
  •         Issue 3

Vol 23 (2026) - Issue 3

Article preview

Re Argentex LLP (in special administration) [2025] EWHC 2625 (Ch); [2025] EWHC 3125 (Ch)

Evie Odiam, Solicitor Degree Apprentice, and Chris Mo, Associate, Freshfields LLP, London, UK

Synopsis
The special administrators of Argentex LLP ('Argentex'), an FCA-regulated payment services firm which offered spot, forward and option foreign exchange contracts to its customers, sought directions from the English High Court on questions relating to what is known as the Lundy Granite principle on liquidation or administration expenses.
The Court considered whether the special administrators, by not performing the foreign exchange contracts in the trading book as they reach maturity,
have adopted those contracts. This would in turn cause liabilities arising under those contracts to rank as administration expenses with resulting super priority in the expense waterfall. The answer to this question was in the negative.
The Court further considered whether, if permitted by the terms of the underlying foreign exchange contracts, the special administrators would likewise be taken to have adopted those contracts and elevated the ranking of those liabilities if they elected to close out Argentex's trades before maturity. The answer here was also in the negative, although this question became academic as the Court found in a later judgment that, on a proper construction of the underlying contracts, Argentex did not have a contractual right to close out the trades before the agreed maturity date.

Buy this article
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 55 / USD 60 / GBP 45
Buy this issue
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 175 / USD 230 / GBP 155
Buy annual subscription
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 560
If you are already a subscriber
log In here

International Corporate Rescue

"International Corporate Rescue is a brilliant resource. The articles are always informative and interesting. It helps to keep me up to date with developments in insolvency and restructuring, both in England and many other jurisdictions."

Charlotte Cooke, Barrister, South Square

 

 

Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.